As western scholars continue delving in to the standard Islamic narrative, they're coming to unravel centuries of inconsistencies and cover-up, etc.
Muslim apologetics tries desperately to make sense of the qur'anic textual evidence, historical facts, and massive theological holes which in less civilized times weren't allowed to be exposed to scholarly scrutiny. Today however, as Islam reaches deeper into western realm of scholarship, they're finding out how their standard Islamic narrative can't stand up to the same material scrutiny.
I'm planning a Stereo App live soon, where I'll tackle Islamic objections to Christianity as well as try and show the material differences between Quranic and Christian manuscript evidences.
While even top Qur'anic scholars have to admit that reliability of the standard Islamic narrative has holes in it, as well as admit that absolutely NO western scholarship accepts the authenticity of Hadiths, the historicity and reliability of the New Testament manuscript evidence has from early on been recognized by a large degree of scholarship.
The New Testament is the most extensive and best attested historical evidence for ancient antiquity. If we deny the historicity of the NT, we'll be forced to admit we know NOTHING about human history with regard to those times in ancient antiquity. We have to deny that we know anything about Plato, the Roman Emperors, Alexander the Great, Aristotle, Homer, etc., etc.
My Podcast will be streamed live on the Stereo app, YouTube and on www.divinenature.net . Date to be set soon so look out for it here on
WWW.DivineNature.NET
😎
